I have examined Next's conduct against two articles of the Criminal Code of Georgia. This dossier contains:

1. An analysis against Article 360, arrogation, the enforcement of a claim by one's own hand.
2. An analysis against Article 150, coercion.

The conclusion of both is that the conduct of Next's personnel fits.

My email of August 11 also cited Article 362, forgery. On its text alone the Article fits: making or use of a forged document. In context it does not. It punishes making or using forged identity cards "or other official documents", in the chapter on crimes against administrative order. The Code knows private documents: Article 341 punishes their forgery when an official commits it. For anyone else, Georgian criminal law does not seem to treat the falsification of a private document as an offense in itself.

What Next did, however, was not merely falsify documents. It tried, by coercion, to obtain my signature on two falsified contracts, so as to create contractual relationships that could not have physically existed, because I cannot time-travel. I am researching whether that conduct constitutes a crime in Georgia.